'We Probably Have Enough Gambling': DeWine Opposes Legalizing Online Betting in Ohio

Governor DeWine Opposes Online Gambling Legislation in Ohio

COLUMBUS, Ohio—As state lawmakers in Ohio have introduced several proposals to legalize online gambling, Governor Mike DeWine has made it clear that he does not support any of these measures during his remaining time in office. During a recent appearance at the Ohio State Fair, DeWine expressed his concerns about the potential consequences of making gambling more accessible.

“I’m not for it,” DeWine stated when asked about the issue. “Putting a casino in everyone’s hands, 24/7, I think is probably not a great idea. And I think it will cause more pain and suffering... as far as gaming addiction.”

When pressed on whether he would veto any online gambling bill, DeWine said, “Well, I don’t usually use the ‘V-word.’ But, you know, I’m very much against this.” His stance highlights a growing concern among some officials about the risks associated with expanding gambling opportunities.

DeWine was slightly more open to another legislative proposal that would allow video lottery terminals and expand e-bingo machines in places like bars, restaurants, and bowling alleys. However, he emphasized that he would evaluate each proposal individually and noted that Ohio already has an abundance of gambling options.

Legislative Efforts to Expand Gambling in Ohio

In May, both the Ohio Senate and the Ohio House introduced bills aimed at allowing the state’s four casinos and seven racinos to offer internet gambling. These proposals would include virtual slot machines and table games such as poker, craps, and roulette. The Senate’s legislation also includes provisions for online Ohio Lottery games and internet betting on horse racing.

A third bill introduced in June by the House would permit video lottery terminals in retail locations operated by Ohio Lottery sales agents. It would also allow any nonprofit organization to operate e-bingo terminals at bars and restaurants, rather than limiting them to veterans’ and fraternal organizations under current law.

If passed, these proposals would mark a significant shift in Ohio’s approach to gambling. Over the past two decades, the state has gradually relaxed restrictions on gambling. In 2009, voters approved a constitutional amendment legalizing casinos and racinos, and DeWine signed legislation allowing sports betting in 2023.

Financial Incentives for Lawmakers

One of the main motivations for lawmakers to push for these changes is the potential financial benefit. According to estimates from the nonpartisan Legislative Service Commission (LSC), passing either the House or Senate bill could generate hundreds of millions of dollars in additional tax revenue annually. This figure does not include the license fees that casinos and racinos would need to pay.

Under the House bill, the state could see up to $550 million in total revenue, while the Senate’s plan could bring in as much as $1.1 billion. Initially, lawmakers had considered using this revenue to fund a state income-tax cut. However, they ultimately achieved the same goal through a combination of spending cuts and halting various state tax exemptions.

Concerns About Expanding Gambling

Despite the financial appeal, critics argue that expanding online gambling could harm vulnerable populations, particularly lower-income residents. They believe it could increase the risk of gambling addiction by making it easier to place bets. DeWine, who has previously raised concerns about online gambling, took a stronger stance during his recent remarks.

Another concern is the impact on Ohio retailers. Critics worry that allowing online lottery games could reduce the number of customers purchasing tickets in physical stores. Additionally, there are legal questions about whether the expansion of online gambling would be allowed under the Ohio Constitution, which currently authorizes only three types of gambling: the state lottery, casinos, and bingo games run by charitable groups.

Legislative Caution and Public Debate

Senate President Rob McColley, a Republican from Northwest Ohio, acknowledged the importance of careful consideration before moving forward. “We would rather take the time to get this right, if we are going to do it at all,” he said in early June.

The debate over online gambling in Ohio continues to reflect a broader national conversation about the balance between economic benefits and public health concerns. As lawmakers weigh their options, the outcome of these proposals could significantly shape the future of gambling in the state.