Hays County Commissioners Reject Septic Upgrade for San Marcos Mall

Septic System Issues Threaten Businesses in San Marcos

A critical issue has emerged in San Marcos, Texas, where an outdated septic system at a shopping center on Old Ranch Road 12 is causing concern among local business owners. The situation has sparked debate over whether the businesses will be forced to close due to the system's limitations.

The shopping center, which has been in operation since 1991, is subject to Hays County's 1986 On-Site Sewage Systems rules. These regulations restrict the property from disposing of more than 579.6 gallons of wastewater per day. However, the proposed new septic system aims to handle up to 725 gallons per day, exceeding the current limit.

Mark Haley, who was hired to install a new septic tank, claims that the original system is failing and cannot support the current demand. He argues that without an upgrade, the shopping center may have to be demolished, resulting in the loss of numerous jobs and businesses.

Haley has requested a variance from the Hays County Commissioners Court to allow the installation of a new system. This system uses incinerator technology, which he says is environmentally friendly and efficient. According to Haley, the system operates within a shipping container, emits minimal waste, and has 24-hour monitoring.

Despite these claims, the Hays County Commissioners Court voted against approving the new system. Commissioner Morgan Hammer, representing Precinct 3, expressed concerns about the proximity of the proposed system to the Edwards Aquifer, citing public health and safety issues.

During the meeting, the design consultant emphasized that the system had passed environmental checks and received approval from the Edwards Aquifer Authority. They stated that the system provides extra capacity for treatment beyond average daily flows.

However, Hammer maintained her stance, stating that the matter had been discussed multiple times before. She moved to call a vote, expressing her opposition to the proposal. The commissioners ultimately voted against it.

Haley criticized the decision, calling it "completely misinformed" and "shortsighted." He mentioned that the next step would involve discussions with lawyers to explore potential legal avenues.

While the county has not specified how long the current septic system can continue to function, Hammer clarified that the businesses are not required to close down due to the denied variance. She noted that the business owners are working with the county to explore connecting to the city sewer line, ensuring that operations can continue.

Hammer added that even if the variance had been approved, another approval would still be necessary to implement the proposed system. She emphasized the importance of finding an environmentally sustainable solution for the businesses.

As the situation unfolds, the future of the shopping center and its businesses remains uncertain. The debate highlights the challenges of balancing environmental concerns with economic interests in a growing community.