Family Condemns DHS for Using Kinkade's Flag Painting

The Kinkade Family Foundation Condemns DHS for Misusing Artwork

The family of Thomas Kinkade has raised concerns over the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) using the late artist’s work to promote divisive and xenophobic messages. The Kinkade Family Foundation sent a cease-and-desist letter to DHS, demanding that it remove a social media post featuring Kinkade’s painting “Morning Pledge.” This artwork depicts an American flag flying above a suburban neighborhood, but it was shared by DHS without permission from the artist's descendants.

In a post dated July 1, DHS included the image alongside the message “Protect the Homeland.” The foundation expressed its dismay over this use of Kinkade’s art, stating that it contradicts the values they stand for. They emphasized their commitment to supporting communities that have been targeted by DHS, particularly immigrant, BIPOC, undocumented, LGBTQ+, and disabled individuals.

Despite the foundation’s efforts, DHS has not responded to the cease-and-desist letter. On their website, the foundation stated that they strongly condemn the agency’s messaging, which they believe promotes division and xenophobia. Their statement highlighted the importance of standing with those who feel threatened by such rhetoric.

Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary for DHS, defended the agency’s actions, stating that they are showcasing art that celebrates America’s heritage and history. She suggested that anyone needing a history lesson could refer to a textbook provided by the administration. McLaughlin also emphasized the administration’s pride in American history and heritage.

Since President Donald Trump took office, DHS has been criticized for posting content on its social media pages that includes racist messaging alongside American symbols. One recent example involved a post on X featuring a painting of Uncle Sam with the caption: “America has been invaded by criminals and predators. We need YOU to get them out.”

Other artists have also spoken out against the use of their work without consent. On July 14, DHS posted a painting by Morgan Weistling titled “A Prayer For A New Life,” though it was mislabeled as “New Life in a New Land.” Weistling, who painted the piece in 2020, noted that the artwork depicts two parents traveling with a baby in a covered wagon, praying for their child’s safety during a perilous journey. He expressed frustration over the unauthorized use of his work.

Right-wing figures have supported DHS’s messaging, including former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Florida), who reposted the Weistling painting with a praying hands emoji. Benny Johnson, a right-wing commentator and YouTuber, also shared the post featuring Kinkade’s painting, captioning it “Beautiful.”

This controversy highlights the broader debate around the use of art in political messaging. While some see these posts as celebrating American heritage, others view them as promoting divisiveness and exclusion. The Kinkade Family Foundation’s response underscores the importance of respecting the intent behind artistic works and the communities they represent.

As the conversation continues, the role of art in public discourse remains a critical issue. The misuse of creative expressions can have far-reaching implications, influencing perceptions and reinforcing harmful narratives. It is essential for institutions to consider the impact of their actions and ensure that they align with the values they claim to uphold.