Candace Owens Stands by Claims as Macron Files Defamation Lawsuit Over First Lady's Gender Allegation

The Legal Battle Between Candace Owens and the Macron Family

Conservative commentator Candace Owens has found herself at the center of a high-profile legal battle after French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron, filed a defamation lawsuit against her. The case stems from allegations Owens made in March 2024, where she claimed that Brigitte Macron was born male. This accusation, which has sparked significant controversy, led to the filing of a 22-count lawsuit in Delaware Superior Court.

The lawsuit, which names both Candace Owens, LLC, and Georgetom, Inc., seeks unspecified damages from Owens. According to the Macrons, Owens shared an eight-part series that spread various allegations about both the president and first lady. These claims included accusations that Brigitte Macron stole another person’s identity and transitioned into a woman. The Macrons have repeatedly asked Owens to retract these statements, with three specific requests made in December 2024, and again on July 1, 2025. Despite these efforts, Owens allegedly continued to promote what they describe as “outlandish, defamatory, and far-fetched fictions.”

The Macrons’ legal team stated that Owens’ actions were intended to harass and cause harm to their families while gaining attention and notoriety. They emphasized that they provided multiple opportunities for Owens to retract her claims but were met with refusal. The lawsuit aims to set the record straight and put an end to what they see as a campaign of defamation.

The Allegations and Their Impact

In the lawsuit, the Macrons detail how Owens used her platform to promote false information. They claim that Owens disregarded credible evidence that disproved her claims, instead choosing to amplify the voices of conspiracy theorists and known defamers. The lawsuit further states that Owens mocked the Macrons and used them as fodder for her fan base.

The eight-part podcast series titled “Becoming Brigitte” and accompanying social media posts are central to the allegations. The content reportedly included claims that Brigitte Macron was born a man, stole another person’s identity, and transitioned to become Brigitte. Additional allegations suggested that the couple are blood relatives involved in incest, that President Macron was chosen as part of a CIA mind-control program, and that they are committing forgery and fraud to conceal these secrets.

The Macrons argue that these claims are demonstrably false and that Owens knew this when she published them. They suggest that her motivation was not the pursuit of truth, but rather the pursuit of fame. After being fired from The Daily Wire, Owens allegedly used these false claims to promote her independent podcast, which has grown significantly in popularity.

Candace Owens’ Response

Upon receiving the defamation lawsuit, Candace Owens did not back down from her claims. On Wednesday afternoon, she went live on YouTube and described the legal action as a public relations strategy. She read through the legal documents and addressed her audience, stating that the filing contained false accusations attributed to her.

Owens’ refusal to retract her statements highlights the ongoing tension between her and the Macron family. Her continued support for her claims, despite the legal challenges, underscores the complexity of the situation and the broader implications for free speech and accountability.

Conclusion

The legal battle between Candace Owens and the Macron family illustrates the intersection of public figures, media, and legal systems. As the case unfolds, it will be interesting to see how the courts address the allegations and what impact this may have on future discourse around defamation and freedom of expression. The outcome could set a precedent for similar cases involving public figures and their right to speak freely while also protecting individuals from harmful misinformation.